JPMorgan Chase & Co. is contesting Charlie Jarvis’ legal fees, which total $74 million and include over $5 million for attorney attendance at her fraud trial, even on non-court days. A recently unsealed Delaware court filing reveals JPMorgan’s argument that Jarvis misused a 2023 order meant to cover her defense costs. The bank is aiming to void $10.2 million in disputed claims and halt future payments, citing excessive and improper charges from Jarvis’ law firms, particularly Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Grofsky Popeo.
JPMorgan noted that Jarvis’ fees far exceeded those of high-profile cases, like Elizabeth Holmes’ $30 million defense. They criticized the firms for already receiving millions while seeking even more for unreasonable expenses. The bank claims Jarvis had between 16 and 29 legal professionals in court daily, averaging $360,000 in fees per day during her six-week trial, with many costs attributed to unnecessary trial attendance.
Jarvis was found guilty of defrauding JPMorgan in a $175 million deal and sentenced to seven years in prison, pending appeal. She is required to repay JPMorgan’s legal costs, but the bank is unlikely to recoup much due to limitations on her repayment ability following her release.
Source link
