The latest edition of the Federal Judicial Center’s “Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence,” which aids judges, has faced criticism for perceived ideological bias, particularly in its climate change section. Critics argue the guide, released this year, leans towards leftist viewpoints, citing contributions from climate advocates like Michael Mann and Jessica Wentz. House Judiciary Committee members are investigating claims that the Environmental Law Institute’s Climate Justice Project attempted to sway judges in climate-related cases. They argue the presence of such contributors in a judicial resource compromises its neutrality. Legal experts have voiced concerns about the guide’s influence on the judiciary, claiming it promotes partisan agendas within the court system. While the Climate Justice Project maintains its curriculum is based on robust scientific consensus, critics insist the integration of trial lawyers’ perspectives into official guidelines undermines the judicial process.
Source link
