Charlie Javis’s lawyers are challenging the requirement for her to wear an ankle monitor following her conviction for fraud, as they argue it would hinder her career as a Pilates instructor. After a federal court in Manhattan found Javis and co-defendant Olivia Air Mar guilty of conspiring to defraud JPMorgan of $175 million related to the sale of Javis’s financial aid startup, prosecutors requested electronic monitoring due to flight risk concerns. Javis, who holds dual French citizenship, poses a potential extradition issue, complicating her legal situation.
Her lawyer Ron Sullivan argued that wearing an ankle monitor is impractical for her profession, while Judge Alvin Hellerstein raised questions about the feasibility of the device during her classes. Javis had previously been allowed to remove her monitor under certain conditions, but prosecutors have now taken a firmer stance, asserting that her work as a fitness instructor does not exempt her from electronic monitoring. The court plans to address this matter again in a hearing scheduled for Tuesday. The article draws a parallel with other convicted fraudsters who have navigated similar monitoring issues.
Source link
