A recent report by the Royal Society warns that deploying solar geoengineering by rogue entities could exacerbate issues like North Atlantic hurricanes, Amazon rainforest depletion, and drought in Africa. While the technology may lower global temperatures when applied worldwide over time, it does not address the root cause of climate change—fossil fuel emissions.
The logistics of large-scale geoengineering are challenging but less costly than comprehensive climate action, with estimates in the billions compared to trillions needed for traditional methods. Experts caution that geoengineering merely masks climate change symptoms and could lead to severe temperature spikes if halted suddenly without emission reductions.
The report outlines two main geoengineering approaches: injecting sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere and marine cloud brightening, both of which could have unintended regional impacts. For instance, targeted injection in certain hemispheres could trigger extreme weather patterns elsewhere, such as increased hurricane intensity or drought.
The topic remains contentious within the scientific community, with calls for continued research to understand the potential risks and effects. Criticism arises over commercialization concerns, particularly given some private firms are investing in geoengineering. Meanwhile, initiatives like the UK’s £50 million geoengineering program aim to explore these technologies through small-scale experiments, reflecting urgency as the climate crisis intensifies.
Source link
