Prince Harry is appealing to the Court of Appeal regarding a decision that downgraded the police protection he receives at public expense while in the UK. His barrister, James Eady KC, argued that a flexible approach is warranted for his personal safety due to his unique circumstances. Prince Harry attended the second day of the hearing, where Eady emphasized that the Royal and VIP Executive Committees (RAVEC), which decide security levels, operate based on “crown privileges” rather than strict legal requirements.
Eady highlighted that the committee, chaired by Sir Richard Motram, has the expertise to make nuanced security assessments and that Prince Harry’s case deserved individual consideration. The current process, as per the Ministry of Home Affairs, evaluates security needs on a case-by-case basis for high-profile visitors. Details of Prince Harry’s security situation were not disclosed for confidentiality reasons, with some discussions held in closed sessions.
During the proceedings, a member of the public expressed frustration with the media, blaming them for Prince Harry’s lack of presence in the UK. Prince Harry’s barrister, Shaheed Fatima KC, argued that RAVEC failed to adhere to its own procedures by downgrading security without a thorough risk analysis. The judges are expected to reserve their judgment following the hearing.
Source link
